It never loads beyond this point.Īfter pushing a button on the keyboard it exits the app with an Exception error see below.
I have attempted to install the Gunconf utility to my Retropie build as per the steps on the Gunconf github, but when I launch the app either from EmulationStation or from the prompt it shows that 2 devices are connected, when I pull the trigger on one of the guns it lists 'Gun detected, loading configuration'. Once the guns are configured and I use the sensor check tab, the IR is correctly captured and showing red, and all movement of the gun across the screen is silky smooth. Each gun has been assigned a unique device number with auto IR gain disabled.
The problem that I'm encountering is that the sensitivity of the gun movement is extremely high, the slightest movement and it dances across the screen, making it nearly impossible to play the game.Ĭonfigured the guns on a windows laptop using the AimTrak configuration utility.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled i.
As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you may not be able to execute some actions. Illness severity prehospital prognostic.Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. These scores, particularly the CIP score, may be considered as a tool for mortality risk stratification or as a general measure of illness severity for patients included in EMS studies. Conclusions: Prognostic scores using physiologic measures assessed by paramedics have good predictive ability for hospital mortality.
Overall, the CIP score had the best discrimination, good calibration, and the greatest range of predicted probabilities (0.01 at a CIP score of 0 to 0.92 at a CIP score of 8) for hospital mortality. Calibration was reliable for hospital mortality in all scores but over-predicted risk for 2-day mortality at higher scores. All scores had good discrimination for hospital mortality (C-statistic CIP: 0.79, MEWS: 0.71, NEWS: 0.78) and 2-day mortality (CIP:0.85, MEWS: 0.80, NEWS:0.85) but only moderate discrimination for ED disposition (CIP: 0.68, MEWS: 0.61, NEWS: 0.66). Results: The Critical Illness Prediction, Modified Early Warning Score, and National Early Warning Score were compared using 121,837 adult patients who were transported by paramedics. Discrimination for each outcome was assessed using C-statistics, and calibration was assessed using calibration curves comparing predicted versus observed outcomes. For each score, binary logistic regression was used to predict hospital mortality and 2-day mortality and ordinal logistic regression was used to predict ED disposition.
Methods: Discrimination and calibration for predicting the primary outcome of hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes of 2-day mortality and ED disposition, were assessed for each of the scores using a one-year cohort of patients transported to hospital by EMS in Alberta, Canada.
This study compares the predictive ability of 3 common prognostic scores for predicting clinical outcomes in EMS patients. Physiologic measures collected by EMS, when incorporated into a prognostic score, may provide important information on patient illness severity. Introduction: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are the first healthcare contact for the majority of severely ill patients.